Marvel Champions Codex

ErrataHall of Heroes (rules 1.5)2023-05-18

2 – With the new deal/take distinction, how would cards like “power stone”, (from the single card encounter…

⚠ This errata is from an older rules version (Hall of Heroes (rules 1.5)) and might be outdated. Errata from older versions are generally folded into the current Rules Reference 1.7.

Question

2 – With the new deal/take distinction, how would cards like “power stone”, (from the single card encounter set) or the nebula treachery “Ruthless” work? Assuming you’re not planning an errata for these and similar? Because I can always deal 3 damage but the intention of power stone seems to be that the attached character needs to take 3 damage for it to be stolen. This scenario came up when nebula had the power stone and the wide stance attachment and my ATK was 3. And with Ruthless, nebula will always deal damage from her attack but the intention seems to be meant for if the character she attacks, takes damage

Erratum

We appreciate the question, but we are not planning to errata cards following the “deal/take damage” distinction, unless a character or scenario would not work without an erratum. For both Power Stone (GMW #149) and Ruthless, the effects of those cards can resolve so long as the character “deals damage” to the target, and do not depend on the target “taking” the damage.

— Alex